jump to navigation

Realm of Disappointed Yawns September 12, 2007

Posted by sensawunda in Books, Hall of Shame, Not Sensawunda.
1 comment so far

In his novel The Traveler, John Twelve Hawks draws upon the very archetypes of wonder—and renders them banal.

To be fair, I had better disclose that I consumed this novel as an abridged audiobook. It’s possible that the abridgement process stripped out the beauty. It did remind me of The DaVinci Code, which I also listened to in abridged form.

Except John Twelve Hawks’s Wikipedia entry mentions that, because he’s such a recluse, people have speculated that he’s just a pen name for a known author—and Dan Brown was listed as a possibility. Twelve Hawks has specifically denied being Dan Brown. But this does suggest to me that the resemblance isn’t just an artifact of abridgment.

John Twelve Hawks seems to be a conspiracy-theory aficionado, so here’s my conspiracy theory: I think there’s a conspiracy among publishers who hawk [get it???] bestsellers. They’re taking the classic sources of sensawunda such as mythology, spirituality, and mysticism, and sucking them completely dry of all wonder and even interest (beyond the synthetic rhythm of formula suspense).

THAT is why his book reminded me of The DaVinci Code.

They both attempt to provide rational explanations for the transcendant. And the sad thing is, I think they both think they are adding wonder to the ancient traditions, with their tales of secret societies and centuries of war waged under the very noses of unsuspecting Muggles (oops, wrong genre).

Twelve Hawks makes a big deal of living “off the Grid,” as if he really believes in the Matrix (which he calls the Vast Machine—he even managed to make that banal). I can’t help wondering how far off the Grid he really is if he’s able to tap into the trend started by Dan Brown, but that’s neither here nor there. Again, it seems to be another attempt on his part to add sensawunda. But he only succeeds in making himself look like a Howard Hughes with no sense of style.


So what. Big deal. October 28, 2006

Posted by sensawunda in Books, Not Sensawunda.
add a comment

The Da Vinci Code could have employed sensawunda. It coulda used a little sensawunda. Instead, author Dan Brown went for sensational and provocative.

I only read it to see what the fuss was about. (Actually, I listened to the audiobook… I probably wouldn’t have made it through otherwise.) I did get a little het up towards the middle at the quasi-historical claptrap with just enough facts to make it sound plausible.

I guess I should be glad he didn’t get sensawunda in there. If he had, he’d be the high priest of a new religion by now, considering how many people took everything at face value. To whom I say: a) It’s a novel, people. b) Find a university. Take a class. Try “Art History for Non-Majors.”

I realize I’m a bit behind the times. The movie release seems to have damped the interest. But I still wanted to put in my 2 cents.

Sensawundameter: BIG GOOSE EGG

Humor isn’t sensawunda… January 26, 2006

Posted by sensawunda in Not Sensawunda.
add a comment

…but I still like it.

Case in point: Ask A Ninja

Just because I blog about sensawunda doesn’t mean I think it’s the only criterion for good entertainment, or good art. Indeed, many great novels and films have absolutely no sensawunda at all. They’re great for other reasons.

I’ve also seen cases where there’s a touch of sensawunda, but that’s only one of several elements that makes the story worth watching or reading.

I get a kick out of the broad, silly, almost nonsensical humor of “Ask A Ninja.” Others (like my husband :-P) find it too sophomoric for their taste. That’s OK. See if I care.